Should You Launch a Fighter Brand? (Spanish version)

  • Reference: HBS-R0910K

  • Year: 1996

  • Number of pages: 8

  • Geographic Setting: Africa

  • Publication Date: Oct 1, 2009

  • Fecha de edición: Nov 30, 2005

  • Source: HBSP (USA)

  • Type of Document: Article

  • Industry Setting: Pharmaceuticals

Grouped product items
Format Language Reference Use Qty Price
pdf Spanish HBS-R0910K
As low as €8.20

You already have a subscription

To order please contact the person in charge of academic purchases in your university.
You'll be able to order once your profile has been validated.

Description

launching a fighter brand. A fighter brand is designed to protect a premium offering by combating, and ideally eliminating, its cheaper competitors. The textbook example is Busch beer, which Anheuser-Busch introduced in 1955 at half the wholesale price of Budweiser. Busch fended off the inexpensive regional beers that were eating into Bud's sales and, even better, opened up a brand-new market segment for the company. Unfortunately, such victories are rare. Too many fighter brands inflict little damage on their targets and instead cause significant collateral losses for the companies that initiate them. What trips them up? Cannibalization of the premium product's sales, failure to create an offering that can compete, unprofitability, inattention to consumer needs, and drains on management's time and resources. With detailed accounts of campaigns lost - and occasionally won - Melbourne Business School's Ritson explains how to avoid those major hazards and launch an offering that wins on all fronts.

Keywords

Brand management Competitive Strategy